The Silent Saboteur: Fatigue in Aviation Safety
The Silent
Saboteur: Fatigue in Aviation Safety
In the high-stakes world of aviation, even the slightest
lapse in judgment or performance can have life-altering consequences. Among the
“Dirty Dozen” list of human error contributors, fatigue is among the most
insidious and underestimated threats to aviation safety (Anonymous, 2024).
What is Fatigue?
Fatigue is more than just feeling tired. In aviation,
fatigue refers to mental or physical exhaustion that reduces a person’s ability
to perform work safely and effectively. It can be caused by long duty periods,
disrupted circadian rhythms, insufficient sleep, or high workload over extended
periods.
Fatigue affects a range of cognitive functions, including:
·
Slower reaction times
·
Reduced attention and concentration
·
Impaired decision-making
·
Memory lapses
In short, fatigue degrades the human brain much like
alcohol, yet unlike alcohol, it often goes unnoticed by others and even by the
fatigued individual (Aldwell et al., 2009).
Why is Fatigue a Significant Threat to Aviation?
Fatigue compromises one of aviation safety's most crucial
pillars: situational awareness. Whether a pilot fails to notice a change in
altitude, a maintenance technician overlooks a critical inspection, or an air
traffic controller misinterprets a call sign, the root cause often comes back
to fatigue.
Real-world incidents have demonstrated this risk:
Colgan Air Flight 3407 (2009) – Both pilots were likely
severely fatigued. The captain made critical errors that resulted in a deadly
stall (National Transportation Safety Board, 2009).
Air Canada Flight 759 (2017)- nearly landed on a taxiway
occupied by other planes at SFO, descending to just 59 feet before aborting.
The NTSB cited pilot fatigue as a contributing factor, impairing attention and
situational awareness during a critical phase of flight (Wallace, 2020).
Fatigue isn’t just dangerous during emergencies—it slowly
erodes performance in routine operations, setting the stage for disaster.
Impact on Overall Aviation Safety
The aviation industry is a system of systems. When fatigue
creeps into any layer—flight crew, cabin crew, ground support, or air traffic
control—it introduces systemic vulnerabilities. This is why fatigue management
is a core component of Safety Management Systems (SMS) in modern aviation(Anonymous,
2024).
In addition to operational consequences, fatigue-related
errors can lead to:
·
Increased risk of accidents and incidents
·
Higher maintenance costs due to oversight
·
Reduced crew morale and retention
·
Legal and reputational damage for airlines
The Way Forward
Combatting fatigue isn’t just asking people to “get more
rest.” It requires:
·
Scientifically informed duty and rest scheduling
·
Fatigue Risk Management Systems (FRMS) backed by
data
·
Training personnel to recognize and report
fatigue symptoms
·
A just culture where admitting fatigue is not
stigmatized
Fatigue will never be eliminated, but by acknowledging it as
a persistent threat and proactively managing it, the aviation industry can save
lives.
References
Aldwell, C., Mm, A., Ma, A., Df, E.,
Erospace, A., Edical, M., Ssociation, A., Atigue, F., & Oun-, C. (2009).
Fatigue countermeasures in aviation . Aviation, Space, and Environmental
Medicine, 80(1). https://doi.org/10.3357/ASEM.2435.2009
Anonymous. (2024). The
dirty dozen: Common human error factors in aircraft maintenance mishaps.
Proquest.com; Superintendent of Documents, Military Airlift Command.
https://www.proquest.com/trade-journals/dirty-dozen-common-human-error-factors-aircraft/docview/2986252541/se-2?accountid=27203
National Transportation
Safety Board. (2009). Loss of control on approach Colgan Air, Inc. Operating
as Continental Connection Flight 3407 Bombardier DHC-8-400, N200WQ Clarence
Center, New York February 12, 2009 .
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/AccidentReports/Reports/AAR1001.pdf
Wallace, A. (2020). Taxiway
Overflight, Air Canada Flight 759, Airbus A320-211, C-FKCK, San Francisco,
California July 7, 2017 NTSB/AIR-18/01. Open GLAM.
https://doi.org/10.21428/74d826b1.b1ae638e
Comments
Post a Comment